Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Transport is one of the prime infrastructure that defines the development of the country. The main question arises is which mode of transport to deserves more funding. Many advocate the idea that Railways should receive the higher monetary assistance from state compared to roadways. As far as I am concerned, i disagree with this distribution as both have their own merits and should be developed equally with sufficient funds.
To begin with, Railways are cheaper add compared to other mode of transportation. In a single trip, trains are capable of carrying higher number of passengers to their destinations. As the expenses of journey gets divided among a larger group of people, fares become pretty lower, thus making it more affordable. For instance, Railway ticket cost from Mumbai to Bangalore is around rupees 500 per seat, where as buses charges rupeed 1500 per seat to its passengers for the same journey. Therefore, Railways proved to be affordable to all sections of society.
On the other hand, accessability is one of the benefit that roads have to offer. It is impossible to have a Railway Station or the airport in each and every corner of the country for trains or flights to arrive. In this scenario, roads seem to be an effective remedy. Roads can connect to the unaccessable and remote areas, thus providing better connectivity. For example, when we deboard a train on Railway station of our desired destination, still we have to hire rikshaw or taxi to reach our desires place. No trains will reach the doorstep of any home. Roadways can be a favorable choice in terms of better network.
To conclude with, as railways ate light on pockets and roads provide good affinity, both seem to be beneficial to its citizens. Therefore, it would be appropriate to have a balanced approach when state has to provide funding for the convenience of its citizens and economic development of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | rex 88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | kindaiIELTS | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | christian_ch | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | r.hojat | 84 | view |
- What makes people most happy? 73
- Some people think that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all the money that they earn. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many advocates'.
Suggestion: Many advocates
... of transport to deserves more funding. Many advocate the idea that Railways should receive t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... to roadways. As far as I am concerned, i disagree with this distribution as both...
^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...angalore is around rupees 500 per seat, where as buses charges rupeed 1500 per seat to i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96884735202 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81473785581 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0042232871 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6111111111 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118543726235 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330900578158 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353461493656 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071713880054 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029163785589 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.