Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages?
With the rise in modernisation, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking bare footed in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues, which remain irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that do disadvantages of throwing away of old things are more than its economic advantages? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic through examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
Nowadays, people are adapting new things as their status symbols. People belonging to every age group are becoming materialistic. Throwing away old things create many environmental issues such as soil pollution. It is caused by things which are non- biodegradable and thus these things turn fertile land to a barren land. According to a survey conducted by agriculture research department of India, it is revealed that eight out of ten farmers are of the opinion that throwing away of old things is a curse for them. Adapting new things also create discrimination among yongsters especially students.
Moving ahead, there are some advantages of adapting new things. People can update themselves by adapting new things. Adaption of new things is equally beneficial for public as well as companies. By adapting new technology we can overcome many environmental issues like pollution. According to a survey conducted by google, it is revealed that by adaption of new things by masses; profits of companies increased by 55.6%.
Overall, it is concluded that one must adapt new things only if old things are no more in the condition of using. Masses should adapt 3R' s method: reuse, recycle and reduce. It means one must reuse old things, waste material should be recycled and use of non- biodegradable things should be reduced. This initiative step should be taken by government and public in a collabration to make world a better place to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | samarjot | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | Mansi patel | 71 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | PRM12 | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Sandeep kaur12 | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Raman Preet kaur | 11 | view |
- In many countries, women no longer feel need to get married. Some people believe that some women are able to earn their own income and do not require security a man can bring. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages 87
- It is said that adultrated food is key reason behind detriorated health of all age group masses. How far you agree or disagree with it? 73
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages Discuss your views 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08641975309 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90445054224 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558641975309 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2913983384 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354723165752 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106161281775 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889439710977 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196860930984 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636766163564 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.