There are different views on traveling. Some people think that traveling in their own country is more beneficial, while others think that traveling to other countries is more advantageous. In my opinion, I strongly believe traveling to other countries is more important because one can learn about the traditions, cultures and can know different people mindsets of other countries.
First of all, people who visit other countries can increase their knowledge in various fields. They can learn about the traditions and culture of different counties. For instance, the festivals in India are different from others. In India, everyone celebrates Diwali festival but people in London celebrates Christmas. Moreover, they can also experience different things if they go to other countries. For instance, When I was a kid, I had a dream to see Burj Kalifa in Dubai, which is the tallest building. I used to see in the pictures. But my father once took me to the Dubai where I saw the Burj Khalifa. I felt really happy because I watched it in real. Which helped me to still remember that building.
Second, in different countries, one can find many people with different mindsets. For instance, the people in India have one type of mindset, they work hard and save money for their children. While in other countries it is different, they enjoy their wages. They wanted to be happy. Furthermore, one can experience a lot of things if they go to other countries like the government rules. For instance, in India, the speed limits on roads were not present, and no one follows that rule, whereas in the USA everyone follows speed limits.
In conclusion, I Strongly believe that visiting or traveling to other countries would help a lot because one can gain more knowledge about the traditions of other countries and can know different people mindsets.
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 71
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 85
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 80
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 73
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lly happy because I watched it in real. Which helped me to still remember that buildi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, still, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00974025974 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68759597412 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487012987013 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5110846175 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.15 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146319092283 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04362205116 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545600574229 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108310681081 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513975106246 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.