Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork. Which of the two approaches do you prefer?
Today's parents, especially those work in big cities, tend to have on enough time to spend with their children. However, the company from parents ususally plays a crucial role in children's growth. To deal with this dilemma, those parents must figure out ways to make full use of the time spent with their children. To avoid being hectic, I believe the best way is to playing games or sports with their children instead of focusing on schoolwork. From my perspective, by having fun playing with their children, parents can not only build up an intimate relationship with their children, but also get to know how to educate them. On the contrary, focucing on school too mach may lead to some bad consequences.
Playing with their children is the best way for parents to enhance an intimate relationship with them, which may be parents first priority. To enhance relationship, parents and children need to communicate with each other. It is obvious that compared to their rigorous parents, children are more willing to share his feelings and secrets with their friends. So what parents need to do is to figure out ways to become their children's friend. I believe playing with their children is the best way to achieve this. My little brother's experience can prove this. Both of him and his father are the fans of a computer game called Warcraft. When they played together, they are not only father and son but also close friends. They talk about everything from how to play the game to my brother's school life, which can be considered as the paradigm of good relationship between parent and child.
In addition to the above benefits, parents can get to know how to educate their children well by playing with them. Plato, one of the greatest philosopher, once mentioned in his great work The Republic that education should match people's talent. Then how can parents find out children's talent ? I believe playing with them is one of the effective way. A child's talent is easily to be identified, especially in sports. For example, if a child has the talent in sorcer or basketball, parents can find it by playing with h and expects him to be an athelete. Otherwise, this kind of talent may be ignored and the world way lose a great athelete.
After focusing on the benefits of playing with children, I will turn to the harm of parents' paying attention to their children's schoolwork during their spare time. I believe this kind of conduct will interrupt teacher's teaching plan. The accumulation of knowledge usually follow some algorithm and children usually learn step by step. Parents busy with their work usually have no idea about what their children have learnt at school so that they can not continue their school lessons. Additionally, their teaching methods may be different from that of the teachers at school, which will inevitably make their children confused.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | 3dra | 63 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement:In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 76
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement:In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young poeple are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in addition, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8893442623 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54798176138 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473360655738 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5316967094 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3703703704 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0740740741 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341275582519 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988033494922 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736939993533 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220622515992 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083710679682 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.