With the development of information technology and the Internet, spreading information is increasingly easier than it used to be, and therefore, it is important to discuss how people should share information, especially that in business, scientific study and academia. While some opine that spreading information freely in scientific study, business and academia is reasonable, I hold that people should share information selectively because of some consequences.
Advocates of arbitrary information sharing argue that sharing information has a positive effect on the advancement in business, science and academia. Specifically, once new findings related to those fields are shared widely, they can be the basis of later researches and thereby help people save time, money and effort when doing later studies. Eventually, this benefit of sharing information makes huge contributions to the development of those fields and promotes other new findings to be discovered.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned discussions, my view is that sharing information arbitrarily can lead to many problems related to intellectual property rights and information confidentiality. For example, if scientific and academic works are shared without control, these works might be easily replicated and beneficial for stealers. This is totally unfair for the authors of these works as they could have spent years completing a work. Besides, when it comes to business, sharing information freely is a culprit of stolen business ideas and customer information leakage. While stolen ideas can directly have a negative impact on companies’ profits, customer information leakage may damage reputation and prestige of enterprises.
For the forgoing discussions, it appears to me that although sharing information freely can generate some benefits for the progression of scientific study, business and academia, doing that arbitrarily can trigger more serious consequences for enterprises, scientists and academic authors.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97916666667 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28750322724 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5899645225 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.545454545 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32081314361 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13400081538 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742771197971 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202262996785 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627622984329 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.