The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 , 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts illustrate the total spending on different things in the school of UK between 1981 and 2001.The data calibrated in percentage.
Having a look on the year of 1981 , total 40% money spent by the UK school on teachers while, it was 10 % greater than as compare to the initial year with in the time period of ten years. The school was spending similar amount about 15% on both things such as furniture and equipment and resources example books in 1981 whereas, difference of 5% could be seen on resources like books as well as furniture and equipments 5% lesser than the first year in over the time period of ten years. Other workers salaries in 1981 and 1991 28% and 22% respectively. Insurance noticed a negligible figure.
By having a glance on other year , there was a more than a two fifths money utilised on teachers however, furniture and equipment 23% and books just under a ten but, the salary of workers 6% more than the former things in 2001.Near around a 10% money expenditure on insurance.
Overall, school spent more money on the teachers with the comparison of other resources.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 89
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S from 1960 to 2011. 56
- The graph below shows population figure for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 , 1991 and 2001. 73
- Unemployment is getting increasingly serious in many countries Some people think student only need to get primary education while others think secondary education is necessary What s your opinion 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... the school of UK between 1981 and 2001.The data calibrated in percentage. Having...
^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...age. Having a look on the year of 1981 , total 40% money spent by the UK school ...
^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resources example books in 1981 whereas, difference of 5% could be seen on resour...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gure. By having a glance on other year , there was a more than a two fifths mone...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment 23% and books just under a ten but, the salary of workers 6% more than the f...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Near
... 6% more than the former things in 2001.Near around a 10% money expenditure on insur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69072164948 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56854798251 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.1613023733 43.030603864 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170743379608 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904628878823 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950369892355 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123786932863 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112509437067 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.