The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 , 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts illustrate the total spending on different things in the school of UK between 1981 and 2001.The data calibrated in percentage.
Having a look on the year of 1981 , total 40% money spent by the UK school on teachers while, it was 10 % greater than as compare to the initial year with in the time period of ten years. The school was spending similar amount about 15% on both things such as furniture and equipment and resources example books in 1981 whereas, difference of 5% could be seen on resources like books as well as furniture and equipments 5% lesser than the first year in over the time period of ten years. Other workers salaries in 1981 and 1991 28% and 22% respectively. Insurance noticed a negligible figure.
By having a glance on other year , there was a more than a two fifths money utilised on teachers however, furniture and equipment 23% and books just under a ten but, the salary of workers 6% more than the former things in 2001.Near around a 10% money expenditure on insurance.
Overall, school spent more money on the teachers with the comparison of other resources.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 61
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 78
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 78
- Many people believe that a member of family is more important than a friend Do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... the school of UK between 1981 and 2001.The data calibrated in percentage. Having...
^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...age. Having a look on the year of 1981 , total 40% money spent by the UK school ...
^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resources example books in 1981 whereas, difference of 5% could be seen on resour...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gure. By having a glance on other year , there was a more than a two fifths mone...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment 23% and books just under a ten but, the salary of workers 6% more than the f...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Near
... 6% more than the former things in 2001.Near around a 10% money expenditure on insur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69072164948 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56854798251 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.1613023733 43.030603864 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170743379608 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904628878823 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950369892355 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123786932863 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112509437067 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.