Topic: Should people use mobile phones in public places?
Mobile phones have become an integral part of our lives. It is argued that the use of cell phones in public places should be encourage. I do not completely agree with this point of view.
Firstly, it is important to recognize that cell phones are responsible for road accidents. It is evident that talking on phones while driving diverts drivers’ attention thereby resulting in the loss of control over vehicles. For this reason, victims are either injured or lost life. Furthermore, users who spend long hours on cell phones are prone to insomnia, shortsightedness and sedentary lifestyle. In simple term, such problems are dangerous should be taken into account.
Secondly, using hand phones in public places such as libraries, trains is unacceptable. People who like spending their leisure time to read books and study in libraries expect a quiet environment so that they can concentrate on what they are doing. Therefore, making or receiving calls on phones are causing a great disturbance to other people. In short, it should be banned or discouraged to use mobile phones in public places in order to avoid unnecessary disturbance to other people.
In conclusion, although cell phones are convenient and have enriched our lives in many ways, their excessive use in public places should be discouraged at any cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | Helen Ng | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | Mai Tran 91 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
... cell phones in public places should be encourage. I do not completely agree with this po...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18981481481 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82523883084 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1989497672 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2307692308 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6153846154 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414858234817 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137591994953 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139196843449 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256932485849 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10021745163 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.