The bar chart illustrates the proportions of families possessing and hiring dwellings in England and Wales during the period of 1918-2011. In general, the first half of the period witnessed the higher percentage of families owning housing than that of those hiring accommodation while the situation was reversed in the last half of the period.
To be more specific, in 1918, over 75 per cent of the households possessed residences while only well over 20 per cent of them rented dwellings. Similar patterns were observed during the period of the next 43 years, with the proportion of families possessing accommodation decreasing to just below 60 per cent and that of those hiring residences increasing to slightly above 40 per cent. In 1971, the figures for both types of households were equal to each other at 50 per cent.
From 1981 to 2001, the rate of families possessing accommodation amounted from 60 per cent to just under 70 per cent while the number for those renting dwellings dwindled from 40 per cent to slightly over 30 per cent. In 2011, the proportion of households owning residences was around 65 per cent whereas that of those renting accommodation was virtually 35 per cent.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whee relevant 60
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 90
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, well, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98507462687 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78042249287 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4033792119 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175682204038 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100364815524 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667305746574 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131284912903 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524200171462 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.