TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama
The reading and the lecture are both about the pros and cons of let it burn policy in the United States. The author of the reading believes that it is not beneficial for the policy to be used, due to, the damage is extensive Yellowstone was burnt for over 2 months and spread across 800,000 acres of land. However, the lecturer casts doubts about the claims made in the article and refutes all the theories presented in the reading passage.
First of all, the author points out that the damage in Yellowstone caused park trees and other vegetation to died out. The author mentioned that majority of the area was scorched by the fire, thus smaller plants also was affected. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that the area that was scorched by fire was easily being replaced by new species of plants. Furthermore, He argues that in this drastic incident something better happened in it's vegetation, it become more diverse and other species of plants grew.
Secondly, the author contends that wildlife was greatly affected, hence, animals such as deer and elk seen escaping the fire, whereas smaller species didn't escape at all. The articles notes that the destruction of ecosystem could greatly affect everyone on the food chain. Nevertheless, the author rebuts this argument. He suggests that different species of seed would not generate if it not because of the great fire that happened in 1988, thus, this new species need great source of heat in order to grow and blossom. He elaborates on this by mentioning that animals easily recover and small plants abundantly grow in the area, as a result, small animals such as rabbits are seen and predators also become apparent, so, the food chance becomes more stronger.
Finally, the author states that the the tourist destination in the park suffered, thus, the tourism in the area declined. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that tourist still supports the park. Moreover, He puts forth the idea that there are few rainfall and strong winds that occurs after the fire, as a result, more visitors flock the park area yearly.
- TPO 09 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support 66
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 80
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of all, the author points out that the damage in Yellowstone caused park trees ...
^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...g better happened in its vegetation, it become more diverse and other species of plant...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...aping the fire, whereas smaller species didnt escape at all. The articles notes that ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'note'.
Suggestion: note
...ecies didnt escape at all. The articles notes that the destruction of ecosystem could...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 747, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...e apparent, so, the food chance becomes more stronger. Finally, the author states that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ger. Finally, the author states that the the tourist destination in the park suffere...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ger. Finally, the author states that the the tourist destination in the park suffere...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun rainfall seems to be countable; consider using: 'few rainfalls'.
Suggestion: few rainfalls
..., He puts forth the idea that there are few rainfall and strong winds that occurs after the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87150837989 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36277187372 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533519553073 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5358743624 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3125 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271431733294 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819345909107 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544076167485 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155983906664 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031116279238 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.