TPO 25
In this set of materials the reading passge discusses that severlar reason to criticize the idea that the copper cylinder that find in a archaeologic site is related to ancent electric batteries. While, in the listening the professor casts doubts on what is presented in the text and believes that each of these reason is not convencing.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that there is not any evidence of electrcity conductors like metal wires. However, the professor claims that the vessels found by local people not Archeologists, thus because this people do not train Archeology so maybe they remove this coductors materials . threrefore we never find its.
In addition, theprofessor disagrees with this idea that the copper cylinders were utilized for holding scrolls of sacred text. She says that isf the copper cylanders have been used for one aim it is not reasonable that this copper cylinders could not had another consum. And also, it is possible that they firsly used from this copper cylinders as scolls and after that adoupt its fopr another purpose.
Finally, in the text it is stated that is vessels were useless for ancent people because they had not any divice that need electristy. the professor subscribes that this vessels could have been used as invisible power for this people and also trtheir doctors maybe used from this ppower for hiting and stimulation of mussels like today doctors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a that the copper cylinder that find in a archaeologic site is related to ancent ...
^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... people not Archeologists, thus because this people do not train Archeology so maybe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain Archeology so maybe they remove this coductors materials . threrefore we neve...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...be they remove this coductors materials . threrefore we never find its. In add...
^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Threrefore
...they remove this coductors materials . threrefore we never find its. In addition, thep...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...per cylanders have been used for one aim it is not reasonable that this copper cy...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...le that this copper cylinders could not had another consum. And also, it is possibl...
^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ad not any divice that need electristy. the professor subscribes that this vessels ...
^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ectristy. the professor subscribes that this vessels could have been used as invisib...
^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d have been used as invisible power for this people and also trtheir doctors maybe u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, may, so, thus, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04201680672 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51244691267 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6677039514 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314442405125 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120730567766 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717442381426 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179784272244 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809781017683 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.