The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Given is the diagram providing a comparison of consumption of fish and meat in a particular European country during 1979-2004.

A glance at the graph reveals that, although great fluctuations were observed the curve for beef consumption ranked first till 1989 and was marginally ahead of other lines. Nevertheless this curve showed an upward trend and had dramatically decreased from approximately 200 to 100 grams for the period of 1989-2004.

The similar pattern is also observed on lamb consumption, precisely, the amount of consumed lamb had gradually declined from about 150 to 60 grams duri...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 9 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2013-11-22 Irene Ridson 70 view
2013-11-22 Nur Shabrina 65 view
2013-11-22 nikilos 70 view
2013-11-12 indah_hai 70 view
2013-11-12 Yora 48 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: In contrast, there was marked great increase on consumption of chichken between 1979 and 2004.
Error: chichken Suggestion: chicken

Sentence: Overall, the graph illustrates that from 1979 to 2004 there were great differecies in people?s meat and fish consumption.
Error: differecies Suggestion: differences

It is on top list:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 168 200
No. of Characters: 874 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.6 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.202 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.878 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.348 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.645 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4