The graph provides information about the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
There are one basic general trend - upward.
First of all, using of CD player increase gradually since 1996 to 2002/03. Likewise, the trend for home computers was upward,
Between 1996/97 and 2002/03 need for computers rose twice. Whereas using of mobile phones grow up significantly: from 17 to 70 percent.
At the same time there was a remarkable fluctuation in the percent of mobile phone’s using between 1998/99 and 2002/03.
It is noticeable that the Internet was inaccessible untill 1998/99 for domestic using. However, utilization of the Internet increased significantly: since 10% to 45% in 1998 to 2002, respectively.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: HOWARDCC
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 90
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 69
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...in the UK. There are one basic general trend - upward. First of all, using of CD pl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 640.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 118.0 196.424390244 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42372881356 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.29587325169 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98996745365 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.694915254237 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8069758011 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11733635297 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650853926837 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150259960513 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848854839585 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168627960306 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.