Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
There is always some disagreement between people that Sharing much information in academic field academic area is good or not. Some believe that they work a lot to gain this information and knowledge, that it could not accessible freely to all. But others disagree. There are some points about both side of in the following.
We all are responsible about our world, especially our country. Making scientist information unfree, would make just accessible just to rich people that would had a tremendous influence on the improving science. In this way we may eliminate poor science or make their research durable, because they could not access from some paper so they should do that researches by themselves, that may cost them so much time, that make them despondent to not continue them researches. And the best way for solving this, is that our country should have some economic strategy to porches some other useful published paper from other foreign university, and make them accessible for all student that their field is related.
In the other hand, make the education information freely, would not be good either. Because there are lots of people that dedicated lots of their time on their PhD thesis and research, instead of going to work earn money, consequently their research and their information should gain them some money to courage them to continue, otherwise they maybe give up their research, get a work to pay their life cost. For instant, one of my best friends, her name is Zahra, was student in Iran's 1st rank university, name is Sharif. She was very intelligent, that always our university professor believes in her, but she had a poor family, and her father has died, because she was elderly she had to providing family spending. Her financial problem makes her to give up continue her education, and to employ for a work. But if the university will pay for their PhD student, of she could earn form her researcher, she would continue and I am sure she would be one of the best, in her field.
To some up, I think the role of government maybe significant in this situation. In my idea, government should devote some money to scientist to defense them and their work, and also provide them, the information from others country that are not free, by buying them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- o you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 73
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 24.0651302605 274% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83928571429 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55257988048 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487244897959 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3874744135 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213500744237 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854608822347 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820791763657 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168013267038 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110503540433 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.