o you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is inevitable to eliminate the role of teachers in our life. By keeping this in mind, each job such as doctors or engineers has their own exclusive positions in the society. Therefore, this job's positions are variable during times dependents on their society demand. Regarding this issue, a controversial question which is often raised is whether nowadays the position of teachers is more valuable compared to their past or not? From my perspective, the roles of the teacher's work are getting decreased in our lives. As a consequent, they will be less cherished by their society. Through ensuing paragraphs, the principal reasons for my point of view will be elaborated.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is the fact that nowadays students are more occupied with the internet that makes them more aware of their lessons. In the contrast, in the past students were just taught by their teachers and there weren't any other sources form them to learn from. However, nowadays they can learn whatever they want on the internet and in some cases we see that some students are more knowledgeable than their teachers, who have less updated data. My personal example is a compelling evidence for this issue that will illustrate my reason. I remember the time that I was in high schools, we had an old math teacher. Each time we told him about his wrong information, he didn't accept his mistakes and insist on his old and archaic knowledge. Thus each student in our schools made laugh of him because of his outdated information!! I'm sure that if he was a teacher in the past, this event wouldn't take place at all. As you can see through this example, the teacher's position is not as valuable as in the past due to the increasing student's knowledge in different fields.
The second equally important point that I like to bring up in order to support my idea is that in the past minority of people were educated. Thus, the ordinary people respect them as an especial person who is distinguished from them. At that times, ordinary people respect teacher in different ways, they also consult with them about their problem, and execute their advice. However, nowadays the number of people who are educated, increased. The more we have educated people, the less the teachers will be cherished. I remember that my father who was a perfect teacher in his own time, always complaining about that nowadays teachers are so prevalent, and they didn't even appreciate that led to others overlook his job.
To wrap it up, based on aforementioned arguments and some other ratiocination that has been eschewed to be mentioned here, I hold the opinion that the teachers are lee valued by society not only because students are more updated than the teacher, but also because, the rest of the society is educated compare to the past.
- o you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 73
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 100
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...just taught by their teachers and there werent any other sources form them to learn fr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...old him about his wrong information, he didnt accept his mistakes and insist on his o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nsist on his old and archaic knowledge. Thus each student in our schools made laugh ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...m because of his outdated information!! Im sure that if he was a teacher in the pa...
^^
Line 3, column 915, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e was a teacher in the past, this event wouldnt take place at all. As you can see throu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1057, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...le as in the past due to the increasing students knowledge in different fields. The s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ays teachers are so prevalent, and they didnt even appreciate that led to others over...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8367768595 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61191267109 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7570463508 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.409090909 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193486966803 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545452214899 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390900957448 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125392866828 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282578444712 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.