The provided bar chart represents the frequency of eating in fast-food restaurants from 2003 and 2013.
At the first glance at the chart, it is apparent that the highest percentage of people visited once a week or once or twice a month over the whole period. In 2003, almost a third of population visited fast-food restaurants only once a week. Meanwhile, slightly fewer number of people ate there up to twice a month. By contract, only 5% of people never had had a meal at fast-food restaurant.
Considering 2006, there were inconsiderably more visitors who ate junk-food weekly than in 2003. Similarly, higher percentage of people used to eat out several times a week, reaching nearly 20%. Over the 10-year period, less ratio of people never ate or ate every day in fast-food restaurant. By the end of 2013, roughly a third of population in USA preferred eating at least once a month.
Overall, there were insignificant changes in how frequently people ate in fast-food restaurants during 2003-2013.
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons there relevant. 56
- friend has decided to switch careers but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 70
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...h. By contract, only 5% of people never had had a meal at fast-food restaurant. Consid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, third, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98214285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8624392873 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.579851714 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256161555713 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114852892082 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769104808843 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192770364191 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591783712476 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.