The reading and lecture both discuss if the petresaurs were capable of powered flight or not. While the reading provides three reasons to support that ptersaurs were not be able of powered flight, the professor refutes, saying that none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that the metabolism of petresaurs could not support the energy that required for flight. This is because these animals considered from cold blooded animals. However, the professor argues this notion by saying that the researchers discovered from pterasaur's fossils that these animals were covered by hair as the warm blooded animals. So, the metabolism of warm blooded animals can produce enough energy to support the flight. In addition, their metabolism is so fast. As a result, pretasurs could support the powered flight.
In addition, the reading shows that these pterosaurs could not flight because they were so heavy. On the other hand, the professor questions this idea by pointing out that now we know that the anatomical feature of these animals has a hallow bones not solid one. Consequently, these animals have a light weight. Besides, this low weight is enough for pterosaurs to flip their wings.
Lastly, the article mentions that birds can jump from the ground by their legs. However, the fossils of these pterosaurs confirmed that these animals have very low backs legs and these legs could not help these animals to take off from the ground. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by explaining that birds and pterosaurs were different. In fact, birds can use their legs to jump but it is a limited push, but pterosaurs could use four limbs to take off from the ground. In addition, researchers supported that there was not any problem for ptersoures to use these four limbs to jump into the air.
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- tpo extra exams q1 3
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 71
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...sons to support that ptersaurs were not be able of powered flight, the professor r...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...anatomical feature of these animals has a hallow bones not solid one. Consequently, thes...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...one. Consequently, these animals have a light weight. Besides, this low weight is enough for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48819244502 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468438538206 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3025886853 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1764705882 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366479080821 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125728563195 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409460099553 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224605372628 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294885775306 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.