Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Modern technology is passing it's most revolutionary stage these days. In the last few decades, the most promising invention it provides to us is 'Car', concluded with some cons along with pros as well as others. But It needs to take into account that, although there is certainly the possibility that superior advancement might come out beyond the car technology today and some might talk that it would no longer be seen while others believe otherwise---that it's strong existence after 20 years of now. I, for one, subscribe to the former group for a guide few reasons, two conspicuous ones of which have been elaborated upon under.
Although being accustomed to a new advanced step in technology, the nature of humankind is still unchanged which is increasing craze of wanting more comfort. As we know, people will be getting double in size than today within 20 years. Furthermore, it can be easily assumed that the traffic problems we are facing now would be calamitous to us at that time. So, prescience based on the statistical report, scientist are working day and night on it and several experimental projects are already going on for instance "Metro Rail" is the most popular and common one.
On top of that, due to globalization environment pollution is another prime concern, responsible by cars which is the one among many. So many detrimental gases come out from the burning of oil used by these cars and these gases have a significant effect on the environment to make it imbalanced. Due to it, the water level is growing up, Climate is changing rapidly and many new diseases come out. Though electricity is the great solution preventing these problems by using it as a source of fuel. But still, it is a matter of fact that, It would not be very cost efficient to use it in lots of cars rater to think about another supplementary which could be like the train.
Due to the aforementioned ground, it can be said that after 20 years the utilizes of cars will be lesser because of the destruction of it is very detrimental and also because to control severe traffic problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of student. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the world cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statements? Use your examples to support. 66
- TPO:52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...ort. As we know, people will be getting double in size than today within 20 years. Furthermore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, well, while, for instance, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80662983425 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79078268511 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593922651934 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.801913675 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16231392273 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524078245284 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434069491362 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953223203726 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154537985423 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.