The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one european city in 1960, 1980 and 2000
The chart illustrates how travellers commuted to work in a European city in three different years from 1960 to 2000. Overall, the proportion of commuters who used cars increased steadily over the period, whereas the percentage of people who travelled by bike or on foot fell dramatically. In 1960, almost 35% of travellers walked to work. The proportion of those who used bikes and buses was 25% and 18% respectively, while in contrast only about 5% of people travelled by car. However, in 1980 the percentage of people who went to work by bus reached 26%, making it the most popular means of transport in that year. Although the proportion of commuters who used cars to go to work saw an increase to around 23%, the percentage of travellers who used bikes fell to 20%, and the figure for those who went on foot was slightly lower at 17%. Over 35% of travellers used cars to go to work in this city in 2000, overtaking the figures for bus users (16%). The proportion of those who travelled on foot and by bike decreased to 9% and 6% respectively. 1
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | quynhthi2001 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Omfiann | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Raksha rai | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o to work saw an increase to around 23%, the percentage of travellers who used bi...
^^
Line 1, column 775, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f travellers who used bikes fell to 20%, and the figure for those who went on foo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53968253968 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69523622562 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6195369682 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253338351159 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141236653967 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114965166719 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253338351159 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.