The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares the proportion of house owning and renting of British and Welsh people from 1918 to 2011.
It is clear, in general, that while renting accommodation was more popular than homeownership in the first fifty-three years of the period, the opposite picture can be seen in the years after 1971. Moreover, the number of people who bought a house followed an increasing trend; meanwhile, that of people renting home witnessed a decrease direction over the same period.
To be more precise, in 1981, nearly eight out of ten British and Welsh people lived in rented houses compared with just over 20% of those who owned homes. In the following years, the gap had been gradually narrowed as the two figures correlated negatively before standing equally at the 50% marking in 1971.
From 1971, most of the British and Welsh people had owned accommodation, and the rate of homeownership was by far more substantial than that of household in rented houses. For instance, rising rapidly from 50 in 1971 to a peak of 70% after 30 years, the proposition of accommodation owners went down slightly to just over 60% in 2011. On the other hand, after a noticeable fall to the lowest point of approximately 30%, the percentage of household who rented accommodation recovered relatively to nearly 40% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss bot view and give your 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the changes that take place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, while, for instance, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92888888889 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78608889988 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.7476634494 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.625 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130333181635 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650673153635 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524904382629 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961060183472 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596288205917 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.