The bar chart below gives information about four countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar charts illustrate the money spent on some different types of products by consumers in Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain in thousand pounds string term in 2012.

Overall, Britain was the country which always spent more money on every kinds of surveyed goods than three other nations. By contrast, in Belgium the spending habits of shopping on consumer goods was obviously low, although in some types of products it was not the countries spending lowest amount of money.

Looking at the details, console games were the consumer goods which consumed more than 155 thousands pounds string of Britain, exactly 150 thousands pounds of Spain, around 147 thousands pounds of Belgium and just more than 145 thousands pounds string of Austria. Similarly, the British used the same amount spent on outdoor game accessories, however, the money spent on this goods by Spanish and Belgian was more than the first mentioned ones ( around 5 thousands pounds higher for each countries), in Spain people used same amounts of money to buy cosmetics. The amount spent on outdoor equipment in Austria was lower than which spent on console games around 5 thousands pounds. Exactly 160 thousands pounds string were consumed for cosmetics in Britain.

The the top one mentioned country of using money to buy books was Britain with more than 160 thousands pounds, the second position was belonged to Austria with nearly 160 thousands pounds string, the top three was Spain with just under 155 thousands pounds and the last one was Belgium with less than 145 thousands pounds string. With the cameras products, the ranking of surveyed countries remained constant with 170 thousands pounds spent in Britain, more than 165 thousands pounds spent in Austria, just above 155 thousands pounds spent in Spain and 145 thousands pounds spent in Belgium. The amount spent on toys of British, Spanish, Austrian, Belgian was around 167 thousands pounds, more than 155 thousands pounds, 157 thousands pounds and 147 thousands pounds respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain in thousand pounds string term in 2012. Overall,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spending the lowest'.
Suggestion: spending the lowest
...es of products it was not the countries spending lowest amount of money. Looking at the deta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ccessories, however, the money spent on this goods by Spanish and Belgian was more t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n was more than the first mentioned ones around 5 thousands pounds higher for eac...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: The
...e consumed for cosmetics in Britain. The the top one mentioned country of using mone...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'The' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: The; The
...e consumed for cosmetics in Britain. The the top one mentioned country of using mone...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 965.302439024 176% => OK
No of words: 327.0 196.424390244 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19266055046 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36503962995 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.409785932722 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3236408645 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.8 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559456094449 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424670870513 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503681605473 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071387179114 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534482015994 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.