Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ

Recently, technology is applied very commonly to human's life. Specially,communication is the career which is affected most through this innovation. Many people afraid that it may change the relationship between people and people, but in my opinion, I'm think that interacting by technology is the wonderful development of human.

Generally, I admit that there are a lot of negative affect appear since people began to use technical devices. The first popular phenomenon is people, specially teenager start to use intelligent devices uncontrollably and become too depend on it. Consequently, they will waste lots of time in unreal world and forget their own society. In addition, using technology too much can increase the risk of being criminals or victims of them. The second dangerous affect of depending on technology is the relationship of people can be destroyed. For example, in the family, if all the members always focus on their all smartphone and nobody chats to each other or cares about their familiar ones, the gaps between members and members will be expand considerably.

However, from my point of view, I'm strongly support the way people apply technology to their life and their interaction with others. The first reason why this issue is supported is many problems of communication in the past like long-distance, high prices, lots of labors required, etc can be solved thanks to the development of technology. Nowadays, people can easily call or share information with others even when they live far from each other, many reasonable prices services appear which strongly encourage people interact with others frequently. The second notion which is not less important explaining my support is technology is the most convenient tool to help people make friends easily and keep in touch with their relatives. Further more, thanks to the changing technology bring to our life, companies now can have more chances to expand their relationships with their partners or their consumers which help them gaining more profit and developing.

In conclusion, although technical devices may bring to our life some negative affects, I still believe that the advantages of applying it in communication is outweigh.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , communication
... very commonly to humans life. Specially,communication is the career which is affected most th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...n people and people, but in my opinion, Im think that interacting by technology is...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to depend'?
Suggestion: to depend
...igent devices uncontrollably and become too depend on it. Consequently, they will waste lo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...bly. However, from my point of view, Im strongly support the way people apply t...
^^
Line 5, column 926, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to gain' or 'gain'.
Suggestion: to gain; gain
...ners or their consumers which help them gaining more profit and developing. In concl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...ages of applying it in communication is outweigh.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32102272727 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98767348601 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7154204721 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.866666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269899326129 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085582921393 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717741081727 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139585368288 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932084389913 0.056905535591 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.