TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one?
The passage and reading both discuss the different ideas of archaeologists in silver coin which was found in the state of Maine in the United States. This would raise a question that it is a genuine historical record or not. The reading passage claims that it is not a genuine evidence. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
Firstly, the reading states that the there is a large distance from the places where Norse was settled them are so far from where the Maine site is located. On the contrary, the lecturer brings up the idea that there is a great distance between these two locations, but it is not impossible to travel to Maine site like other Native American who travel large distances to visit there.
Secondly, the reading assets that no other silver coin have been found in the Norse settlements and it reveals that Norse bring no coin with himself to America. Conversely, the lecturer states that it is not necessary to find another coin to prove the historical reality of the silver coin. Also, Norse was permanently had settled at Maine site, so he brings all his coins back to Europe when he came back to origin he comes from.
Finally, the reading holds the view that silver coin is unusable in America, so Norse couldn’t bring them with himself and no American recognize silver coin as currency. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that the silver coin is so beautiful and attractive, he might bring it to display to others.
- TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one? 78
- TPO 21- Independent 3
- TPO 40: surface of the venus is not possible habitant for human 68
- Do you agree or disagree? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 70
- imagine that you are in classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thingto do? 1.interrupt and correct the mistake right way; 2.wait until the class or meeting is 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72118959108 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42461841904 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505576208178 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0309351887 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486930690893 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175309472432 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110401363184 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279994240402 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100226584786 0.0443174109184 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.