Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The printed documents and materials had been used since ancient times. And most of the readers and writers prefer work on a paper than on a monitor or computer screen because they got used to it and they feel more comfortable. Besides all these usefulness of using printed materials they are not suitable for this age anymore. There are some reasons for that; using paper is damaging nature resources, the printed materials are hard to stock and reach from every corner of the world.
First and foremove, to publish a printed book, article or a magazine some amount of paper has to used which means some trees have to be cutten. Maybe it was not a problem even in the last a few decades. But now, when we consider the population of the world and printing to books for everyone is not an efficient way to reach each possible reader. Essipacially, magazines are printed for one in a mouth or week and every time we need to print a new one, so this is also a serious example to waste of resources. Additionally, when we print this kind of books or magazines we need to consider also what will happen them after they used. If we can share the printed books maybe we can save some resources to being waste. For instance, in Turkey government gives new books for each year to primary and high school students and end of the year these books go directly to dustbin, so they are not stocking to use for next year.
Secondly, when we just print the book we cannot reach this book from everywhere it is impossible to reach from every person in the world. Because it is printing in a limited amount and it can be reached just by who can buy it or from library users close to that areas. So, in today’s population this is not an efficient way. However, if we published this article or book on internet we do not need to cut a tree, stocking it after read. Just sharing it from a website and whole world can read it at the same time.
Consequently, printing a book or article is not an efficient way in todays’ world to reach everyone. It is also wasting the resources. However, sharing it by using internet means saving energy and guaranteed to reach more reader than the printed one so internet is more useful way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | skmsamu | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | kathishivaram | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Afruzi | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Modern life is easier than life in the past.Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 66
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture that you just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. You can refer to the reading passage as you write. 3
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this usefulness' or 'these usefulnesses'?
Suggestion: this usefulness; these usefulnesses
...they feel more comfortable. Besides all these usefulness of using printed materials they are not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... what will happen them after they used. If we can share the printed books maybe we...
^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted one so internet is more useful way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4802955665 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44360423949 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6358022599 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7368421053 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226595780674 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790083865529 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683171122078 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163695170877 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681945740921 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.