Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Farmland, housing and industry are the some of the most significant topics which are discussed by governments of the counties in the world. They are discussing this issue because they believe most of the people are suffering from these points and they are right most of their public are just focusing on these dilemmas in their life. However, they can not see whole pictures of the world because of their selfish life style. There is a more valuable issue than basic human life standart peoblem and it is endangered animals issue. This is a more significant problem because of balance of the ecologic life, industry and housing can cause a destroyed circle and human needs to eat healthy.
First of all, balance of the ecology has a value on human life. Because if the world ecologic circles were not working, this can bring the end of the world since the oxigen and nitrogen and circles of the other minerals which have significant effect on the human life are dependent the balance of the ecologic life basicly, if the lions hunted to much and they are not exist anymore. After that there is nothing to eat rabbits so they eat to much plant so what will convert the carbondioxide to oxigen. As we all know, oxigen rate has mortal importance on human life.
Secondly, If the governments just focus on the framland, hausing and industry and they do not care the endangered animals what. At the end of this perspective there will be no place to for animals or even plants. What is the plan for this point? I beleve governments are not caring much future mostly they care about their age. We need to give some space for our descendants. And this policy will destroy itself by bringing the own end. Because there is no sustainability on these kind of projects.
Thirdly, the people also do seeing the point of what will they eat. Because even some animals can not find to eat some foods and they do not continue to their tips. This will effect also humans. As I remember there is an important signal coming from Einstain, he is saying if there is no place for bees on the planet, than there is no place for human also. Since they are helping the polenization of the plants, we can easily say if there is no bees, there will be no plants and there will be nothing to eat by people.
As a conlusion, saving some lands for the endangered animals can be so helpful to sustain the ecologic balance and food for the people. Additionally, by focusing on just farmlan, housing and industry world can be entered a destroyed circle this policy can be logic for this age but it can not create a sustainability for our future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 66
- Essay topics: Distance learning and online learning should replace learning classroom.Agree or disagree? 70
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture that you just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. You can refer to the reading passage as you write. 3
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional systems 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
Farmland, housing and industry are the some of the most significant topics which ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...logic life basicly, if the lions hunted to much and they are not exist anymore. Af...
^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...e lions hunted to much and they are not exist anymore. After that there is nothing to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...e is nothing to eat rabbits so they eat to much plant so what will convert the car...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...destroy itself by bringing the own end. Because there is no sustainability on these kin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
.... Because there is no sustainability on these kind of projects. Thirdly, the people al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...o not continue to their tips. This will effect also humans. As I remember there is an ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...lanet, than there is no place for human also. Since they are helping the polenizatio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 434, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no bees'?
Suggestion: there are no bees
...ion of the plants, we can easily say if there is no bees, there will be no plants and there will...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, even so, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5966029724 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42942958341 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418259023355 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6193986717 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1304347826 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4782608696 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184606843536 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673811795103 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540123000685 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116444606821 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418619632756 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.