Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
This statement is fundamentally correct; in the past finding job which lead you successful and secure was easier than the now; some people keep the view point that it is easier to find a good job and be successful in it than the before, but I totally disagree with them and I want to reinforce my view point front the following aspect.
The first reason why I totally agree with the statement is that in the past people most of the time chose their decendents career and job, since it would be easier to them to be successful because they used experiments of the ancestries and can adapted to the new development because there were a few occur on their career, while in the each passing day we see the changes in the world accelerate and you need to take yourself update if you want success in your job and career.
The later reason why I generally agree with the statement is that on the past you just to be familiar in your own major. However, now day's you need a broad view about the things which is related to tour major. For example, I'm a civil engineering and I work on the blockouts in the Guard rail if I want to be successful in my major, I must know about the material, about the climate that we design block out to it and the possible climate changes in the future during the inuse period so on and so on. Besides, you have to be capable to know the speed amount machines which want to use highway in the future.
Last but not the least, you need to be familiar to the most of the software in your major. Besides, able to write code in the C#, MATLAB, ABAQUS because it gets lots of costs if you want to experiment all of your design model. Therefore, we model them in one of the soft wares that I mentioned and we just do experiment in which be performed successful in the software. However, in the past you never need to know about all of these soft wares at all.
All in all, all the time if you want to be successful, you need to work hard and make new innovations in your career, but because of the new development in the scients and broading all of major to each other, it is harder than the before to be successful in your major and I believe it going to be harder in the future than now. In short, I totally agree with the statement based on the reason I mentioned above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-19 | Christine hanna | 81 | view |
2018-12-04 | jiaoj27@hotmail.com | 3 | view |
2018-10-19 | Mroza | 73 | view |
2018-10-19 | Mroza | 73 | view |
- Imaginative works such as novels plays films fairy tales and legends present a more accurate and meaningful picture of human experiment than do factual accounts Because the creator of the fiction shape and focus reality rather than report on the it litera 50
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold, arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the North Slo 3
- People should be realistic rather than romantic in order to live a better life Do you agree or disagree with the statement Use specific reasons to support your answer 38
- “Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.” 50
- In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all of the faculty should be required to spend time working outside of the academic world in the professions relevant to the courses they teach. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... is related to tour major. For example, Im a civil engineering and I work on the b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 22.412803532 245% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 30.3222958057 264% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 439.0 270.72406181 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25056947608 5.08290768461 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32678756215 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419134396355 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.969457176 49.2860985944 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 155.5 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5833333333 21.698381199 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263206271262 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981407111961 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844078810973 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162811441015 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819125529557 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 12.2367328918 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.