The pie charts show the proportion of Oscar winners by film genre in two years, 2003 and 2008. There are seven genres shown: Thriller, Documentary, Romance, Science Fiction, Action, Comedy and Horror.
In 2003, the order of the winning genres was: Thriller, Action, Horror, Documentary, Science Fiction and Romance and Comedy. In 2008 the order was: Thriller, Action, Science Fiction, Documentary, Romance, Horror and Comedy.
Thrillers won the most Oscars in both years, dominating the other genres with a 45% share in 2003, but dropping to 33% in 2008. In second place in both years were the Action films, with 15 and 20% respectively. Romance and Comedy films were low ranking, with share of around 5-7%. Science Fiction movies, fourth place in 2003, won more than twice as many Oscars in 2008 than in 2003, rising from a 6% share to 13%, and displacing Horror films to end in third place. Documentaries also improved, gaining 5% in 2008 over their 10% share in 2003. On the other hand, Horror films fared poorly in 2008 compared to 2003, when they were in third place. Their share fell from 13% to 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | priestomar | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | min ng | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | min ng | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | min ng | view | |
| 2019-06-02 | chickenbound | 78 | view |
- We can get knowledge from news but some people think we cannot trust journalists What do you think What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have 81
- Young people should spend more time on cultural activities such as music and theatre and less time sport. How far do you agree with this statement ? 73
- aaaa 11
- advantages and disadvantages of social networking. 73
- Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34091631561 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7553897774 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8181818182 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.