New parents should attend parenting class to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many people believe that new mothers and fathers should attend training sessions to enhance their parenting skills. At the same time, however, there is some uncertainty about the merits or demerits of this situation. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, participating in parenting classes can be beneficial since most young married people, especially in China, lack experience of handling new babies, and formal training may be an effective and comprehensive approach for them to acquire the necessary skills. Moreover, people attending such sessions can make new friends and share their experiences, which provides more opportunities for them to gain a fuller picture of the parenting process. In addition, a structured introduction to the art of raising a family could set aside misconceptions and old wives’ tales, and enable young mothers and fathers to take a fresh and enlightened approach to guiding their offspring’s mental and physical development .
On the other hand, critics would argue that classes are redundant, since parenting is a natural and instinctive process which has existed without formal education since time immemorial. Moreover, there is an increasing tendency for universities, especially in Western countries, to produce “sociologists” who believe they know better than ordinary people about family life, and being “trained” in parenting by such people could be intrusive and even harmful to a new family. In addition, on a more practical level, given today’s competitive economic environment, finding the opportunity to attend such training is a luxury few working mothers and fathers can afford.
To summarize, there is no doubt that parenting classes could be helpful to some people, and possibly even reduce dysfunctionality in certain families. At the same time, however, caring for one’s children is a natural instinct, and training is by no means essential. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that, if people have the luxury of time and money to attend a class, and it makes them feel better about being a parent, then why not?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-13 | Falola helen Oluwatoyin | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | brianarcher | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | Frank Chen | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | Zuhriddin | 61 | view |
- In many cities planners have separated schools homes shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents 66
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems might this difference cause How might these problems be reduced 84
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Schools should concentrate on teaching students the academic subjects that will be useful for their future career. Subjects such as music and sports are not useful. To what extent do you agree of disagree? 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...g's mental and physical development . On the other hand, critics would arg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, in addition, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47941176471 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23056700179 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7439762433 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.25 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178825735642 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718224436031 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620654906373 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12041734108 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197385495315 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.