According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
A memo is shared from the advertising director of the super Sceen movie production company, in which they have discussed about the bad performance of the movies produced by them. it is mentioned that the movies from the super screen production are not performing well even after getting good critic reviews. Further they have pointed the lack of awareness of public to be the prime reason of this performance. The arguer's claim doesn't sound convincing enough on the basis of explanation given.
Initially it is claimed that the fewer people attended super screen produced movies in the past year, but the arguer did not provide any information on the perormance of other movies. There is a possibility that all the movies did not perform well in the past year due to some financial constraint or because of some other major entertainment or sports event. complete study has to be done before comparing the performance of the movie. Here the argues did not provide strong evidence to support his claim.
Further, arguer claims the movies in the past year received more positive reviews as compared to the other years but even than less people attended the movies. The theme is a major part which attracts more people to watch a movie, but the arguer has completely missed this point. The theme or topic showed in the movie might be focused on the particular segment of people. critics rate a movie on its content, which might be good, but people will only go for a movie when it sounds appealing to them.
The argurs has directly blamed the public's awareness for the bad performance which does not sound convincing enough. The company has to make sure what kind of critic are reviewing the movies and if these critics are widely accepted or not. The company has to be aware about the current trends and the topic which attract larger set of audience.
Finally, the arguer emphasises on allocation a larger budget for advertising to increase the awareness. Instead, the current trends, topics and the common interest of audience should be identify upfront before producing these movies. From the above observations the arguer's claims can be strictly denied. these claim lacks the evidence to support it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Cynic | 43 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | nimesh94 | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | mcmaster | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | a251ravind | 63 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet fer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 66
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 26
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 77
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 16
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 374 350
No. of Characters: 1800 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.398 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.813 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.453 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.474 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.608 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ormance of the movies produced by them. it is mentioned that the movies from the s...
^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... of this performance. The arguers claim doesnt sound convincing enough on the basis o...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he arguers claim doesnt sound convincing enough on the basis of explanation given...
^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Complete
...er major entertainment or sports event. complete study has to be done before comparing t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...mpared to the other years but even than less people attended the movies. The theme i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Critics
...ed on the particular segment of people. critics rate a movie on its content, which migh...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
.... The argurs has directly blamed the publics awareness for the bad performance which...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ese critics are widely accepted or not. The company has to be aware about the curre...
^^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'identified'?
Suggestion: identified
...e common interest of audience should be identify upfront before producing these movies. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... arguers claims can be strictly denied. these claim lacks the evidence to support it....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 373.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94101876676 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48518961887 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514745308311 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8471192052 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21052631579 5.70786347227 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288547548222 0.218282227539 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830468111099 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113423567125 0.0701772020484 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153727612847 0.128457276422 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976764348241 0.0628817314937 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.