Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is argument that the most effective method to enhance public health is by providing more sports centers or health clubs. While this argument is justiciable for some reasons, I believe that there are many solutions to address this situation.
To commence with, by supplying more gym clubs or sports amenities can bring positive impacts on public health. Thanks to building more sports centers, it allows people to go to the gym conveniently. This means that they can put time aside and even save money about commuting to the fitness clubs. By doing this, a number of people who go to the gym to engage in physical activities may be increased and people’s health are more likely to greatly enhance. Furthermore, sports centers, nowadays, go far from their house and most people tend to lead a sedentary since they may be overloaded with working or studying. As a result, the increasing popularity of gym classes or sports clubs gives people more chances to improve their heath.
However, I would argue that rising the provision of sports amenities would have little influence on public health and there are several solutions to boost people’s health. Firstly, governments should raise people’ awareness of the importance of health protection. This can be explained by the fact that a person would easily avoid some health problems when they are armed with knowledge about health care and medicine. If people have a good health, they can do anything what you like. Secondly, thanks to cutting-edge technology, people are likely to improve their health. For example, health protection programs, thus, should be promoted so that people know how to protect their health effectively.
In conclusion, sport facilities which are becoming more prevalent have brought a wide range of benefits for people; however, I personally argue that a several methods should be apply in life which would have more positive influences on improving public health.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your op 73
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007, and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. Make comparison where relevant. 61
- Đề 1 Writing, reading and math are the three recognized traditional subjects. Computer skill should also be the fourth largest branch. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Furthermore, sports centers, nowadays, go far from their house and most people ...
^^
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'method'?
Suggestion: method
...ever, I personally argue that a several methods should be apply in life which would hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'applied'?
Suggestion: applied
... argue that a several methods should be apply in life which would have more positive ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21135646688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69563112668 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539432176656 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4009578445 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319797270939 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12062997116 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669601172344 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202061163857 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504067411251 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.