Human activity has had negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion?
Preservation of nature is essential for survival of living being. However, nowadays there are many human action's, which are having adverse effect on the environment. A segment of society asserts that this action are impossible to alter or control; whereas others including me have dissenting view, and believe that proper steps can be taken to solve the issue.
Considering the views of the people who think that nothing can be done, because people's actions are difficult to control. The predominant reason for this is growing population, specially in third world nation's. Human being are not having enough food to eat and shelter to live, which is basic requirement for survival. They are forced to destroy the natural habitat of the animals in order to find a dwelling unit, therefore deforestation is continuously increasing. Moreover, if animal will not have the natural environment to live, due to destruction of forest, there survival will be difficult and ultimately they become extinct. Apart from this, people are also killing animal in order to get the food to eat. As, enough food is not been produced to feed the growing population.
On the other hand, others including me believe that necessary actions can be taken by the government and individuals to bring the positive change. Government should organize the educational programmes, to spread the awareness among the public about the negative effect of their deeds on the nature. Authorities should also have the proper planning of the towns and cities, so the effective utilization of limited space can be done, and house must be allotted to each family. In addition, preservation of forests and wildlife in National Park, is also effective way to conserve wild life. For instance, Gir National Park is India is providing natural living place to wild life and working continuously for their survival, also providing timely medical facilities if required. Authorities should also educate the farmer about all the modern equipment and agriculture technique, so that more production can be done on the limited agricultural land, in order to feed the growing population.
In conclusion, though humans are forced to do the activities, which harm the environment in order to survive. But, if state and people work together and determine to bring the change we can definitely over the problem
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-14 | brianarcher | 89 | view |
- Some people fail in school, but end up being successful in life. Why do you think that is the case? What is most important thing to succeed in life? 61
- Many parents believe that when their children read books for entertainment, they are wasting their time, and that they should read only serious educational books. What is your opinion about this? 73
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement?? 56
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhereTo what extend do you agree with this view? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... They are forced to destroy the natural habitat of the animals in order to find ...
^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...animal in order to get the food to eat. As, enough food is not been produced to fe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21315789474 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7807945914 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9847805395 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.055555556 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249880187051 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745516546755 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758758889187 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141276319699 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384114134079 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.