Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view?

Essay topics:

Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.
To what extent do you agree with this view?

In my opinion, definitely, publicity should have some important limitations. I do not think that it is negative at all, neither think that everything might be prohibited. However, I truly support some fences to them, such as an advertising for children and dangerous products. So, I totally agree with that statement.

When I say that I believe in fences, I mean that some methods to advertising can be terribly prejudicial for children’s development. This doesn’t mean that they would be completely preserved to have access to advertisements; but, certainly, they don’t have enough maturity to process everything that they are seeing on television, for example.

In Brazil, in 90’s, all kind of publicity were allowed for everyone, including children and babies. This fact was very important for infants programs industry, at that time. Despite of all channel have many cartoons available for us, suddenly, government decided to prohibit all advertising for children, without any exception. This fact wasn’t as good as they expected because every publicity was sharply banished from the channels and this make unsustainable keep showing children’s programs. This fact forced TV’s companies to change their schedule for something for adults. And, this, understandably, at that time, push us to watch videos on Internet or to pay private channels.

I would argue either that fences should be established in some kind of products. I would say that government shouldn’t allow marketing to alcoholic drinks or medicines with heavily effects. Permit this surely will incentivize people to consume this product and, in my point of view, they shouldn’t be stimulated at all. They bring many problems and struggles for who consume them and I strongly agree with the ideia to prohibit all advertisements related to these products.

Therefore, I think that government should think courageously about all aspects of publicity, even for children even for alcoholic drinks . They have to balance very carefully all the benefits and the damages caused by them. And then, decide precisely what should be limited and what deserve to still been presented.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-22 Thilmi 78 view
2019-09-24 Sakthisv 11 view
2019-08-26 Timjay 73 view
2019-07-25 hamzamanzoor 73 view
2019-07-14 Saira Faiz 73 view
Essays by user Yuri Manata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are seeing on television, for example. In Brazil, in 90's, all kind of pub...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very publicity was sharply banished from the channels and this make unsustainable...
^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...y bring many problems and struggles for who consume them and I strongly agree with ...
^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n for children even for alcoholic drinks . They have to balance very carefully all...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, then, therefore, for example, i mean, i think, kind of, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49408284024 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.088240587 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582840236686 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2879222143 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7368421053 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177164992247 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604562934127 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378378777327 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106089430302 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401194712293 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.