The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables describe sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas from 1999 till 2004 in UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden.
In the first table, the sale of coffee increased over the period of five years in the five European countries. The coffee sale in the United Kingdom experienced the most dramatic increase, from 1.5 million euros in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004. Meanwhile, the coffee sales in Switzerland were doubled from 3 million euros to 6 million euros. Also, the coffee sales in both Denmark and Sweden increased by the same amount of euros(0.2), from 1.8 to 2.0 million euros and from0.8 to 1.0 million euros respectively.
However, from the second table, the whole sales of bananas in the five countries showed a different pattern in the five years. The five years witnessed the most significant rise in Switzerland, from 15 to 47 million euros. United Kingdom and Belgium had a similar increase, ranging from 1 to 5.5 million euros and from 0.6 to 4 million euros respectively. Nonetheless, the sales of bananas in the rest two countries declined—from 1.8 to 1 million euros in Sweden and from 2 to 0.9 million euros in Denmark.
In conclusion, the first table, where the coffee sales in UK far exceeded those in any other country, presented the whole rise of coffee sale, while the second one, where the banana sales in Switzerland much surpassed those in any other country, described the different situations of the banana sale.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why? What can be done to attract local people? 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95141700405 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79703469847 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441295546559 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0389150502 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225499642073 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119773591598 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088631337963 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174942813227 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713992866531 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.