The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent its money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the twenty years, while that on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend.
There was an increase in the expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment in the twenty years. Teachers’ salaries, with 40%, took up the largest proportion in 1981 and rose to 50% in 1991 before slightly falling back to 45% in 2001, which stood still at the highest position. Meanwhile, the amount of money on furniture and equipment, equal to that on resources such as books (15%) in 1981, rose to 23% in 2001 after suffering a great dip at 5% in 1991. Also, the two decades witnessed a rise can be seen in the spending on insurance from 2% to 8%, a fourfold rise.
However, the amount of money on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books experienced a decrease over the period of twenty years. The percentage of other workers’ salaries presented declined from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001, almost a double drop. In the meantime, a dip can be seen in the proportion of resources e.g. books from 15% to 9%, despite a peak at 20% in 1991.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 56
- It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend? 73
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- Schools should concentrate on teaching students the academic subjects that will be useful for their future career. Subjects such as music and sports are not useful. To what extent do you agree of disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., however, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85152838428 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91286343043 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5552083316 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193856606947 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831274235993 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112425464098 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142236749575 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858855898622 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.