The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The graph depicts the percentage of American residents eating frequently in junk food restaurant during10 years. Overall, the figure for once or twice a month and that for a few times a year experienced an increase, while other frequencies a decrease.
Looking in details, there was a growth of once or twice a month figure, rising slightly from around 30% to about 33%--the maximum number in this statistical data. Likewise, a few time a year figure presented a gradual increase to roughly 15% before leveling off at the end of the timeline.
However, the percentage of several times a week and that of once a week had a similar pattern. The former climbed to nearly 20% in 2006 from 18% in 2003, and afterwards suffered from a noticeable fall to approximately 16% in 2013. Also, the latter rose to roughly 33% from 31% in 2003, and then declined to 27% in 2013. At the same time, the timeline witnessed a moderate drop in the proportion of people eating every day and never in a fast food restaurant in the first three years before remaining stable at around 2% -the smallest percentage of people who attended to fast food restaurants during the 10 years.
- The diagram below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose. 78
- New parents should attend parenting class to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050 85
- Now children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time doing sports. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- some people suggest higher education should be funded by the government while others think students should pay the course fees themselves Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...r in this statistical data. Likewise, a few time a year figure presented a gradual incre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the smallest'.
Suggestion: -the the smallest
...rs before remaining stable at around 2% -the smallest percentage of people who attended to fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, likewise, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73399014778 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.677275322 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8522801545 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160343652041 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595902340707 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686097387962 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916256321928 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804610170714 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.