Research are essential for developing new medicines and treatment to get better health and less disease.
Who individual, private companies or government should fund these researches
Most people regard that jobs will be overtaken by artificially intelligent robots in the coming years. Despite the thought that jobs requiring rudimentary skills can be done by digitally designed robots today, there are still a few that necessitates human contact. This essay will discuss why robots are better substitutes as a workforce yet humans remain indispensable in some areas.
In our current generation, robots are apparently operating on a huge number of jobs in many fields. It is for the reason that companies are aware that they can spend less and save up with high performance robots rather than employing humans that has to undergo screenings and training to perform well. For instance, automated car wash can run impeccably on an entire week and even on holidays too, proving that job breaks aren't necessary and thus making more profit. So overall, robot will eventually replace human beings.
On the other hand, there are fields which demand human skills and expertise. These are the fields that are unlikely to be handled by robots alone. To name but a few, politics, religion, medicine and psychology requires human manipulation and thinking. humans will still be regarded and remain in specifically significant domains of work.
It is a fact that most jobs has been considerably taken over by smart robots. While robotic machines may entirely be dominating menial jobs, human skills will still remain needed and prevail in highly regarded jobs. Considering the aforementioned, with the increasing competition with the innovative working robots, human workforce may still exist.
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016 77
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 81
- Research are essential for developing new medicines and treatment to get better health and less disease.Who individual, private companies or government should fund these researches 11
- The tables below show the value of Australia's trade with China, the USA and Japan from 2012-2015 in billions of Australian dollars. 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
... has to undergo screenings and training to perform well. For instance, automated car wash ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...n holidays too, proving that job breaks arent necessary and thus making more profit. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to be handled by robots alone. To name but a few, politics, religion, medicine ...
^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...quires human manipulation and thinking. humans will still be regarded and remain in sp...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as been considerably taken over by smart robots. While robotic machines may entir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30980392157 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75142128872 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639215686275 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2500475345 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0378027942265 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0138904457722 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0208657812735 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0239737345775 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186791781053 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.