The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given chart illustrates the information about how often people of the united states ate fast food in three years: 2003, 2006 and 2013. An overall view indicates the number of people who use fast food every day or never is less than 5 per cent. Those people who had eaten fast food just a few times in a year were about 12 per cent in 2003, which increased to 15 per cent in 2006 and 2013.
On the other hand, the number of people who ate take away food several time a week in 2003 was around 16 per cent but the figures have gone up to 20 per cent in 2006 and in a seven-year period it declined to slightly more than 15 per cent in 2013.
It is noteworthy that in the three mentioned years, the number of people who ate fast food once a week or twice a month was equal to or more than 25 per cent. Despite the fact that the portion of people who had eaten fast food once a week experienced an upward trend from 2003 to 2006, but it has decreased to less than 30 per cent in 2013. Conversely, those people who ate fast food once a week or twice a month, which was 30 per cent in 2003, fell to 25 per cent in 2006 but it rose to 35 per cent in 2013.
To sum-up, it seems that one-quarter of USA population preferred to have fast food once a week or twice a month in 2003, 2006 and 2013.
- You recently did a home renovation Write a letter to your friend and suggest to use your tradesman if he she needs one Tell your friend about the renovation Recommend your tradesman Explain why it is a good idea 92
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sport center now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 11
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...number of people who ate take away food several time a week in 2003 was around 16 per cent b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 3.98084291188 4.92477711251 81% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0110964759 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417624521073 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.941462479 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262133721735 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167367629189 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699968308419 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192610555816 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623917958657 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 81.3 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.4 11.4140731707 56% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.