Vegetable oil as a fuel for cars.
Both the reading and the lecture are about using vegetable oil as an alternative to gasoline. The author of the reading believes vegetable oil utilization is not a promising technology, and it provides three reasons for that. the lecturer, on the other hand, argues the opposite. He gives evidence to support the use of vegetable oil.
firstly, the reading passage points out that the parts one needs to purchase for the car to run on vegetable oil are indeed expensive. furthermore, as a result of clogging over time, this equipment is prone to be high maintenance. however, the lecturer claims that the higher fuel economy of a vegetable oil car will compensate for the extra cost of equipment in a short period.
Secondly, the reading states that using the equipment demands extra attention for the driver since he or she needs to switch it on and off on every drive. By contrast, the lecturer believes that switching the equipment on and off cannot be a tough task and the driver will soon get used it. Moreover, he claims that in the early future this mechanism will get automated and the driver’s extra attention won’t be required.
Lastly, it is stated in the article that, using food crops for vegetable oil production, which is mostly the case, can result in shortage of food crops. Therefore, by increasing the demand for vegetable oil in transportation, the price of foods using this oil, such as salad dressings and French fries, could rise significantly. However, the lecturer argues that the vegetable oil is produced out of waste products of restaurants and chips companies rather than the food crops. So he believes the increased use of vegetable oil won’t interrupt food supply.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | YasamanEsml | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | zaid | 83 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...and it provides three reasons for that. the lecturer, on the other hand, argues the...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...e to support the use of vegetable oil. firstly, the reading passage points out that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
... on vegetable oil are indeed expensive. furthermore, as a result of clogging over time, thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ipment is prone to be high maintenance. however, the lecturer claims that the higher fu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97909407666 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77326526949 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519163763066 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0463030737 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349688866178 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135453173509 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101599499952 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22489737863 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114471907397 0.0443174109184 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.