Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer. Do you agree or disagree?

In the era of technology, using a computer is becoming ubiquitous. It is usually claimed that the internet can provide a replacement for the necessity of museums and art galleries inasmuch as historical objects and art works can be available on the internet. From my perspective, i totally dissent form this notion.
Firstly, the information accompanying the objects in museums or picture galleries is remarkably accurate now that scientific researchers research them painstakingly. On the contrary, websites and online resources can occasionally lack authenticity and research-based presentations. Furthermore, only when going to museums, art galleries or exhibitions, viewers can have a wonderful opportunity to experience historical relics in their own eyes and hands. Historical objections provide infallible testimony about the past. Hence, the history, culture or tradition of a country can be reflected in museums displays. Internet also provide people information about them. However, it can not be denied that the feeling when searching for historical and artistic collections on websites is significantly different from the real experience of observing them directly.
Secondly, museums and art galleries play a prominent role in the growth of tourism and economy. They can get tourists' undivided attention who are keen on understanding country’s cultural and traditional values . In addition, art galleries or museums create a golden chance of ample employment for the people of the country. Hence, museums and picture galleries not only generate a huge revenue but also globalize local cultural knowledge.
In conclusion, museums and galleries are indispensable for each country. It seems to be hardly replaced bay computer-based information.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
... From my perspective, i totally dissent form this notion. Firstly, the information ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y's cultural and traditional values . In addition, art galleries or museums c...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7380952381 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34062485274 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9600478465 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296828414419 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889166461949 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633641379101 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175218631509 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567282531515 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.