Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students' sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The Budgets of universities are limited. Universities cannot decide easily if they should spend the same amount of money for sports activities as they do for their university libraries. If I am responsible for managing the university, I prefer to spend money on sports than on a library because of following reasons.
First, sports can enhance learning abilities of students, mentally and physically. Sports are essential for having a healthy body. In university, students have to study many subjects simultaneously. Robust bodies are indispensable for students to endure many exams or assignments. If the faculty spends more money on exercise facilities, they can attract more students to build their bodies through playing sports or training in the gym. Besides, to learn efficiently, students must be able to withstand heavy pressure. Playing sports can release students' pressure, and they also can feel fulfilled. Thus, playing sports benefits students both physically and mentally. Consequently, improving sports facilities certainly can improve students’ efficiency in learning.
Second, students can learn teamwork abilities through sports games such as baseball. In university, many subjects require students to do group projects or group presentations. If students cannot interact with other group members well, it could cause inefficiency in teamwork. Sports can teach students to assume responsibilities and work with others in team. Take baseball as an example. A baseball team requires at least 11 players and every member has different responsibilities. If the team cannot cooperate well, it is difficult to win a game. Thus, in a baseball team, everybody has to know how to support and cover each other. These behaviors are also important in doing group projects. Hence, playing sports can make students cooperative and develop teamwork skills.
Undeniably, spending money on library and increasing the number of books might benefit students in the aspect of studying. However, if they do not have healthy bodies, they cannot be motivated to study. In conclusion, sports activities benefit students, and universities should spend as much money on sports activities as they spend on library.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | hadimz | 71 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | tenseitsai | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing and they shouldn t be required to help family with household chores such as cleaning and cooking 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students' sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? 63
- Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning. 66
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, well, as to, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.0286738351 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56973293769 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03654362228 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543026706231 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0144740404 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.08 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.48 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254220799513 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693720604948 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766137663975 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180605890813 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860946298395 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.