Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them?
Friends are essential for having a better life. If people are sensitive To me, I agree with the statement that people easily learn from the friends beside them because of the following reasons.
First, people tend to behave as their friends. To be concise, friends have great influences on a person. People spontaneously behave like people who they admire. Generally, a person makes friends with people who have some features or characteristics that he or she likes. Spontaneously, people will imitate the behaviors. Also, the environment is a very important factor for a student. If most of his or her friends are diligent, he or she would learn from them and become diligent. By contrast, if the friends do not think studying is important, he or she also would be affected by them and copy them. Hence, people easily learn from the friends and have the same attitudes toward many things.
Second, interacting with friends can learn cooperation. Only by interacting with friends can people learn cooperation abilities. Cooperation abilities are indispensable in companies because they want to improve work efficiency through teamwork. Thus, teachers occasionally let students have group projects with their friends and provide opportunities to teamwork. Through discussing with friends or separating responsibilities with group members, people can learn and enhance their cooperation abilities. To accomplish a group project efficiently, students have to encourage and cover each other with group members. It is
Undeniably, some might think that people are not easy to be affected by friends. However, I have the opposite opinion. I think people cannot learn how to cooperate without friends. Hence, I agree with the statement that people easily learn from their friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning. 66
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing and they shouldn t be required to help family with household chores such as cleaning and cooking 89
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students' sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 696, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same attitudes toward many things. Second, interacting with friends can lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver each other with group members. It is Undeniably, some might think that people...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people easily learn from their friends.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 279.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43369175627 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91656742422 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508960573477 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9889436682 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1904761905 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2857142857 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411063501244 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129302281467 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125819942366 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292560591451 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126448331722 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.