People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow student or co- worker- than those from high level, such as teachers or supervisors?
People always have the tendency of learning things in which way as much as possible eraser for them. While some people tempt to learn from their friends or colleagues other prefer to learn from their teachers or someone who has benefited of higher level of knowledge. I am of the opinion saying people learn more from those at their level. There are virtually myriads of reason but due to lack of enough time I go for to most conspicuous reasons. In what follows, the two most stand out reasons will be thoroughly elucidated in two paragraphs.
Firstly, the most important reason which is worth being taken into account is that sometime people have some simple or superficial questions and think asking this questions may make them seem fool to those at higher level. They are afraid of being embarrassed, so they aren’t willing to ask their questions. So with unanswered question they couldn’t constitute the foundation of their knowledge. For example, during my university time I always got problem with dynamic course. Usually, I asked my questions from professor during the class, but if I didn’t understand at first time it didn’t go to be twice. I prefer ask my questions after class from my classmates.
Secondly, another pivotal reason which is worth being taken into account is that always learning from people who have the same way of thinking as yours on the same topic is more convenient. These people can share the way of their learning scheme which probably is more convincing and convenient for you. For example when I was in the first year of elementary school, I always had problem with multiple operation. I asked several times from my teacher, but I couldn’t understand. One of my friends named jack taught me the multiple operation by drawing some lines on paper which was exactly what he had done to learn.
To wrap it up, contemplation aforementioned reason one can effortlessly recapitulate that people learn better from those at their own level because they feel more comfortable with them and also they can be benefited by other’s experiences for learning things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-23 | Rezabozorgpour | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-23 | Rezabozorgpour | 71 | view |
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow student or co- worker- than those from high level, such as teachers or supervisors? 73
- young children should be more funded or university student?agree or disagree? 76
- young children should be more funded or university student?agree or disagree? 76
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow student or co- worker- than those from high level, such as teachers or supervisors? 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...rtlessly recapitulate that people learn better from those at their own level because t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76469837192 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3290878153 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.117647059 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250308424053 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898397162059 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105313253698 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182973838145 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823586120707 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.