young children should be more funded or university student?agree or disagree?
In the predecessor decades governments have realized that in order to get as much as possible prosperity and make more breakthrough, dedicating more budget to development of education system and as a result an increase in the rate of well-educated people is a crucial term. Whether the sector of training young children should be received more money or universities is one of most argumentative question among people. However, I am of the opinion declaring universities should receive more money. There are a lot of reasons but due to lack of enough time I will delve into two most conspicuous reasons to clarify my stand point. In two following paragraph two reasons will be thoroughly elucidated.
Firstly the most important reason which is worth being taken into account is that in the university student choose their career and opt what field they want to go deep into and make their specialties. So this is clear that the spent money for them will not be wasted. In the other hand young children are lack of confidence about what they are supposed to be in future and likely they do not have any plan for their future, because psychologically they do not have the capability to know what to do. For example when I was in first class of elementary school I always wanted to be a pilot, but in the middle school I decided to be a doctor and eventually I became an engineer. Spending money needs to consider the student majors. What field of study for me should have been funded? Wrong choice could have the spending money in wrong way.
Secondly, another pivotal reason which is worth being explained is that some of student in the middle of their way stop studying and pursue their dream of being any things else that they want. So what will happen to the amount of money spent for them? For example my cousin left the studying in the second year of high school. First he was studying in a high quality school which cost a lot for my uncle. After leaving the school, he occupied himself with some casual works. After several times changing his job, Eventually he became a building painter.
to wrap it up, contemplation aforementioned reason one can effortlessly conclude that spending money for universities is more efficiency, because first student do not know what major they will be in and also some of them my abandon studying in the middle pf their way. Not only have conducted studies endorsed this reasons also people are seeing less and more this evidences around themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | irina_stoica | 83 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-20 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
- children should be allowed play video games or not? 76
- young children should be more funded or university student?agree or disagree? 76
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow student or co- worker- than those from high level, such as teachers or supervisors? 73
- people should make their decisions independently or by others help? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...tually he became a building painter. to wrap it up, contemplation aforementione...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76905311778 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6300054106 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501154734411 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7111408245 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223786806217 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677971302287 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751192708947 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139682922054 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649000741429 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.