Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
There has been a matter of concern among people about the scientists’ prediction that only one language will be spoken by people all over the world in the future. While there are some drawbacks of this development, I believe that it is more advantageous for our society.
On the one hand, merely speaking a language can lead to undeniable consequences. In fact, when only a similar language is used by the majority of people, this can pose a significant threat to the disappearance of the enormous number of other languages. Subsequently, the lack of other languages can result in great losses in terms of cultural and traditional values. For instance, young Vietnamese people tend to consider more Western occasions such as Christmas than conventional festivals of their country due to the increasing popularity of learning English in Vietnam.
On the other hand, I suppose that using a similar language is a positive enhancement. The main advantage of this tendency is that individuals all around the world would find no difficulties in communication. For example, using the same language can boost time spent on exchanging information in many important areas such as business and tourism. In addition, by using the same language in writing, learners can easily look for materials released by the variety of overseas authors instead of limited books published by solely indigenous writers. As a result, not only can this trend promote working efficiency but it also facilitates students’ learning.
In conclusion, I believe that purely speaking one language are much greater benefits than its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | My Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to drawattention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make theproblems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on of the treatment of those who are already ill.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 78
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28294573643 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08825232871 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5882953845 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.583333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840532851446 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323642554184 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0163091470192 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520292880739 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182128083667 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.