Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Over past decades, a plenty of research has been done about the influence of single language society on the humanity. Some commentators believe that speaking the same language would be benefited while some think society influenced negatively. Despite the fact that this issue will bring a new set of concerns, I think it would be a positive promotion for couple of reasons.
First of all, it should be stuck in the mind that languages are the first poems of each culture. In fact, all languages are rooted in some cultures. With regard to this matter of fact, languages play a key role in keeping a culture alive. However, languages are just one feature of any culture and there are several factors such as traditions, customs, rituals that can keep a culture alive.
On the other hand, speaking similar language promote a sense of unity and community among different nations and improve the friendship and cooperation. Speaking the same languages can bring the variety of culture close together and increase the understanding among people all around the world. The social interactions will enhance without difficulties and without need to translation. International relationships would promote that leads to high economic growth rate. Tourism industry, as an outstanding instance, will be effected significantly since many people refuse to travel where they might have difficulties to communicate with the population of the host country.
Another advantage of this phenomena, is contributed to providing people with opportunity to learn a useful language. Although, being bilingual is considered as an appropriate practice to keep the mind active which is efficient in increasing the memory.
Taking everything into consideration, it seems that speaking a unique language will bring with it some positive impact that the main one is the promotion of a sense of cohesion and friendship among nations. Besides, some barrier in communication will be removed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | My Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- Some educationalists argue that non-exam art-based subjects, such as music, drama, art and craft, should be compulsory in the secondary-school curriculum. They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance. To what extent 78
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has the technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 11
- Studies have suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active o 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith the population of the host country. Another advantage of this phenomena, is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...host country. Another advantage of this phenomena, is contributed to providing ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rrier in communication will be removed.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, while, i think, in fact, such as, first of all, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35806451613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92767660826 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1283966054 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136082378618 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441255837654 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430654847949 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771096039916 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402717936552 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.