Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
Recently, the phenomenon of student casual work and this corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of working while studying profits is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that gaining experience can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, well educated students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of modern learning methods, as well as skilled human sources, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the awful results of working while education. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both study time and break time of college apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the science, low- income college students might increase the consequence of unskilled employees. Moreover, fundamental aspects of expensive education faculties would relate to this reality that the demerits of working and learning pertain under pressure study. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of lack of high level education is correlated negatively with less experienced work power. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of skilled workers.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of best results of education far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of new methods of learning prove the significance of university period, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
2019-06-18 | Nasir-RZN | 88 | view |
2019-03-03 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
2019-03-03 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
2019-02-04 | arami | 80 | view |
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 77
- Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind? 88
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 85
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pertain'
Suggestion: to pertain
...at the demerits of working and learning pertain under pressure study. As an example, so...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to prove'
Suggestion: to prove
...e advantages of new methods of learning prove the significance of university period, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57509157509 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05275701019 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659340659341 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4852751848 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.363636364 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212594686325 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694766549209 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341036024679 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114043084486 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269693791063 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.