Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe
How the government spends public funds often spikes debate among people. There is a controversy about what areas such as arts or sports should get more support. Personally, I believe that arts should receive more funding. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, art is the portrayal of a society´s culture and traditions. Through art, people communicate not only communicate their feelings but also the characteristics of the society where they live. As an illustration, in my country the artworks made by artists from different backgrounds represent the vastly differences between people from distinct geographical areas. People from the highlands usually show the local customs and traditions of their hometown through their paintings. These artworks often feature local activities such as pottery and agriculture, which communicates how the locals make a living in that place. On the other hand, artists from major cities select more urbanized landscapes.
Secondly, art is often not supported enough by many governments. Although art is very important to people learn about culture, usually not much financial resources are given to institutions that promote art. For instance, in my country athletics are given support from both private and public funds. Since sports events draw the attention and of many people, athletics teams have no problems in getting sponsors and support from large and well-known companies. However, arts is not promoted enough. Artists who want to show more about the different aspects of our country do not have enough resources to make their creations easily available to the public. If these artists could get more support for the government, people would be more aware of local´s artists artwork and be able to enjoy and learn a variety of topics from them such as local customs and traditions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that arts should receive more support from the government. This is because art helps to promote local culture and local artists usually do not have enough resources to get their artwork known to the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Directions: You have 30 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typic 3
- In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to be among the most important in the history of world cinema. To this day, in fact, it remains the American box office c 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live.Use specific reasons and details to explain your opinion. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74572636153 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536656891496 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4334007732 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9473684211 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193744867162 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720742236 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616171532312 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140070346613 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632692708711 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.