Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society?
Over the past few decades, the world has seen an upsurge in the trend of students choosing social subjects rather than science ones in university. This essay will outline several possible causes as well as several potential effects for this tendency.
To begin with, one of major reasons why students gradually becoming indifferent to science fields is the impractical content. This will be proven by looking at how much knowledge students can apply in their real job. They study a wide range of complex algorithm, but still struggle with how to draw a feasible solution in the face of pressing problems or how to convince other people to follow their new ideas. Under this circumstance, students predominantly choose social subjects so that they may be able to hone their communication skills, which are useful to any types of occupations. Therefore, it can be concluded that studying science majors seem to not provide students sufficient soft skills for their future jobs.
Unfortunately, if this tendency is still on the rise, it will carry a certain degree of risk to the society. For instance, the shortage of human resources relating to science fields may pose a severe threat to the stability of job market. In all probability, job opportunities would be significantly competitive with respect to social majors, while the lack of science workforce lead to economic depression. However, this phenomenon partly has a positive impact on the community when it comes to social awareness. The more people take social activities into account, the more social urgent issues being mitigated, from the weight of stigma towards mental disorders to sectarian violence.
On the whole, it seems to me that the variation of students’ preferences is unavoidable. Therefore, instead of ceasing it, we should find a way to adopt and preclude from adverse repercussions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | star_nana | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | zentirot | 41 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Trần Trang | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | anhtuan1095 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-23 | honza | 73 | view |
- More and more children are performing their talents on reality show Some people welcome this as a way to nurture young talents others are worried that rising to fame at such an early age may disrupt children s personal development Please argumentation to 87
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025. 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...activities into account, the more social urgent issues being mitigated, from the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the whole, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21262458472 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90810609292 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0356177605 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185692208012 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603837349699 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418099614865 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105655783423 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640335794211 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.