Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays in the period of rapid globalization, in every city there is a bright variety of museums, which attracts tourist from all around the world. Personally, I believe that people visit museums in order to add an intellectual aspect to their trips. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the gallery is a place, where visitors are able to observe the legacy of ancestors. Continuously, in such places people absorb experience of previous generations and compare consequences from a current perspective. My own experience is a compelling example of this. In my childhood, I was travelling a lot with my family and my dad always carried me to historical museums. This experience implemented in me conceptual thinking and formed me as a person.
Secondly, galleries are the only possible way of direct contact with the history. Presently in natural museums, humans can witness artifacts from a deep past, which do not exist in a modern society. For instance, one of the most vivid recollections of my childhood is our trip to natural museum in Berlin. I have watched many cartoons about the dinosaurs as a youngster and always dreamt of seeing them in the real-life. In that exhibition, not only my dream came true, but it influenced my entire professional road as well, as I have decided to be a paleontologist.
In a nutshell, museums serve as a bridge to knowledge and provide people with the elegant atmosphere to learn the history effectively. Furthermore, without the past there is no future, as without analyzing actions of previous generations humanity is going to simply repeat owns mistakes. Today, almost every town in the world has realized the importance to set up their own museums to exhibit historic items which belong to their past, that is why exhibitions are places, which will never lose their popularity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Maged Hassan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | Hafween | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | akshata | 60 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | khosrow nouroozi | 70 | view |
- Dowsing 78
- Rembrandt 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Nowadays computers are an important part of most people s everyday lives This change has improved the way people live 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A minimum number of physical education credits should be required for graduation college.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...s without analyzing actions of previous generations humanity is going to simply repeat owns...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99367088608 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96785507662 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604430379747 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6634113213 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135262163515 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393639433926 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050923160624 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746631618009 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241322144849 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.