cane toad
The article states the three measurements to prevent scattering of cane toad in Australia and explains detail and result of these ways. However, the professor assert that not only are these ways unsuccessful but also they are damage the environment and refutes each of the author's ways.
First, the reading declares that building a national fence can stop spreading of cane toad. In contrast lecturer says that fence cannot block flow of the rivers water from one side to another side of fence and some young toad and matured toad's egg can transmit via river water and because of this reason the fence will be ineffective.
Second, the article posits that volunteers group of Australia people can trap cane toad as well as can gather toad's eggs and destroy them and by doing so stop scattering of this toads. The professor opposes this ways because she believes that untrained volunteers cannot differentiate between native endanger frog species with cane toad and destroy all species.
Third, the author states that producing a virus to triggered disease in cane toads and inhibiting maturing and reproducing these toads. The professor strongly refutes and rejects this way because terrible consequence of spreading a virus in environment in all species in environment. According to professor’s argument dispersing infected species to other country where this species are native member of those ecosystem will destroy other countries ecosystem.
- TPO 45 3
- cane toad 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TOP 47.Pterosaurs reptile powered flight ability 70
- TPO 46- electronic medical records instead of medical paper records 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...nce can stop spreading of cane toad. In contrast lecturer says that fence cannot block f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...them and by doing so stop scattering of this toads. The professor opposes this ways ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ng of this toads. The professor opposes this ways because she believes that untraine...
^^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ecosystem' or 'those ecosystems'?
Suggestion: this ecosystem; those ecosystems
...where this species are native member of those ecosystem will destroy other countries ecosystem....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...r of those ecosystem will destroy other countries ecosystem.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30303030303 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67209348295 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7168994103 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.111111111 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353122961308 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168561160377 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130619632352 0.0662205650399 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221918703059 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080381525503 0.0443174109184 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.